Effectiveness of two adhesive universal with functional monomers on enamel and dentin with different application modes

Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2023     |     PP. 31-49      |     PDF (386 K)    |     Pub. Date: May 16, 2023
DOI: 10.54647/materials430226    92 Downloads     93551 Views  


Carolina Gealh Navarro Escobar, Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa. Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
John Alexis Dominguez, Department Social dentistry, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Giovana Mongruel Gomes, Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa. Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
Diego Alonso Melendez Murillo, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Bruna Fortes Bittencourt, Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa. Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil
João Carlos Gomes, Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa. Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil

Purpose: evaluated the effectiveness of the 3D-SR monomer in comparison with the 10-MDP monomer in bond strength (enamel and dentin), nanofiltration (dentin) with application of conventional and self-conditioning modes, sorption and solubility. Materials and methods Seventy-two molars were randomly divided into six groups according to the type of monomer of the adhesives: two adhesives with the functional 10-MDP monomer and one adhesive with the functional 3D-SR monomer, namely, Ambar Universal (AU), Single Bond Universal (SU) and Palfique Bond (PU), respectively, which were associated with the conditioning mode of the substrates. Thirty teeth were selected for the dentin microtensile bond strength test. For microshear bond strength analysis, four flat enamel surfaces of 42 selected teeth were exposed. After preparation of the substrates, the adhesives were applied and then restored with composite resin. For the sorption and solubility samples, a cylindrical metallic matrix was used. Ten matrices were prepared for each adhesive. All data were submitted to a two-way statistical analysis (ANOVA) with Tukey’s posttest (P = 0.05). Results: It was observed that the adhesives with the 10-MDP monomer showed better results of bond strength both in dentin and enamel regardless of the type of application and that the PU adhesive with the 3D-SR monomer showed lower results of bond strength independent of the substrate with self-etching application mode. Conclusion: The 10-MDP monomer showed the best bond strength results when applied in a self-etching mode regardless of the substrate compared to the adhesive with 3D-SR.

Dentin adhesives, tensile strength, scanning electron microscopy, microshear, functional monomers.

Cite this paper
Carolina Gealh Navarro Escobar, John Alexis Dominguez, Giovana Mongruel Gomes, Diego Alonso Melendez Murillo, Bruna Fortes Bittencourt, João Carlos Gomes, Effectiveness of two adhesive universal with functional monomers on enamel and dentin with different application modes , SCIREA Journal of Materials. Volume 8, Issue 2, April 2023 | PP. 31-49. 10.54647/materials430226


[ 1 ] Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Martini AP, Santos PH, Giannini M, Janal M, et al. Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin-adhesive interfaces. Dental materials 2015;31:141-153.
[ 2 ] Bahrololumi N, Beglou A, Najafi-Abrandabadi A, Sadr A, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM, Ghasemi A. Effect of water storage on ultimate tensile strength and mass changes of universal adhesives. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2017; 9:e78-e83.
[ 3 ] Carvalho CN, Lanza MDS, Dourado LG, Carvalho EM, Bauer J. Impact of Solvent Evaporation and Curing Protocol on Degree of Conversion of Etch-and-Rinse and Multimode Adhesives Systems. International journal of dentistry 2019:5496784.
[ 4 ] Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles?. Journal of dentistry 2015;43:525-536.
[ 5 ] Chen L, Suh BI. Effect of hydrophilicity on the compatibility between a dual-curing resin cement and one-bottle simplified adhesives. The journal of adhesive dentistry 2013;;15:325-331.
[ 6 ] Cuevas-Suarez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The journal of adhesive dentistry 2019;21:7-26.
[ 7 ] Fujita K, Ma S, Aida M, Maeda T, Ikemi T, Hirata M, et al. Effect of reacted acidic monomer with calcium on bonding performance. Journal of dental research 2011; 90:607-612.
[ 8 ] Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. Journal of dental research. 2006; Oct;85(10):941-4.
[ 9 ] Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of Etching Protocol and Silane Treatment with a Universal Adhesive on Lithium Disilicate Bond Strength. Operative dentistry 2015;40:372-378.
[ 10 ] Loguercio AD, Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Perdigao J. Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? J Dent 2015;43:1060-1070.
[ 11 ] Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Junior LH, Spohr AM. Bond Strength of a Novel One Bottle Multimode Adhesive to Human Dentin After Six Months of Storage. The open dentistry journal 2016;10:268-277.
[ 12 ] Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative dentistry 2004;29:481-508.
[ 13 ] Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I, Abu Zaghlan R, Steier L. Longevity of Self-etch Dentin Bonding Adhesives Compared to Etch-and-rinse Dentin Bonding Adhesives: A Systematic Review. The journal of evidence-based dental practice 2016;16:96-106.
[ 14 ] Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015;40:282-292.
[ 15 ] Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. Journal of dentistry 2014; 42:595-602.
[ 16 ] Nishiyama N, Suzuki K, Takahashi K, Nemoto K. The pKa effects of the carboxylic acid in N-methacryloyl-omega-amino acid on the demineralization and bond strengths to the teeth. Biomaterials 2004;25:5441-5447.
[ 17 ] Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Hosaka K, Tagami J, Donnelly A, Carrilho M, et al. Use of Hoy's solubility parameters to predict water sorption/solubility of experimental primers and adhesives. European journal of oral sciences 2007;115:81-86.
[ 18 ] Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, et al. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 2014;;39:489-499.
[ 19 ] Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Operative dentistry 2014;39:113-127.
[ 20 ] Pouyanfar H, Tabaii ES, Aghazadeh S, Nobari S, Imani MM. Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite to Enamel Using Universal Adhesive with/without Acid Etching Compared To Etch and Rinse and Self-Etch Bonding Agents. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences 2018; 25;6:2186-2192.
[ 21 ] Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC, Geraldeli S, et al. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:877-885.
[ 22 ] Reis A, Wambier L, Malaquias T, Wambier DS, Loguercio AD. Effects of warm air drying on water sorption, solubility, and adhesive strength of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. The journal of adhesive dentistry 2013;15:41-46.
[ 23 ] Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:765-776.
[ 24 ] Sezinando A, Serrano ML, Perez VM, Munoz RA, Ceballos L, Perdigao J. Chemical Adhesion of Polyalkenoate-based Adhesives to Hydroxyapatite. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:257-265.
[ 25 ] Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2016;32:e9-21.
[ 26 ] Turkistani A, Almutairi M, Banakhar N, Rubehan R, Mugharbil S, Jamleh A, et al. Optical Evaluation of Enamel Microleakage with One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives. Photomedicine and laser surgery 2018; 36:589-594.
[ 27 ] Turkun LS. The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2005; May;136(5):656-64; quiz 83.
[ 28 ] Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28(26):3757-3785.
[ 29 ] Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, et al. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. Journal of dental research 2008;87:757-761.
[ 30 ] Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Operative dentistry 2003; 28:215-35.
[ 31 ] Vermelho PM, Reis AF, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clinical oral investigations 2017; 21:1707-1715.
[ 32 ] Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;;42:800-807.
[ 33 ] Walter R, Swift EJ, Jr., Nagaoka H, Chung Y, Bartholomew W, Braswell KM, et al. Two-year bond strengths of "all-in-one" adhesives to dentine. Journal of dentistry 2012;40:549-555.
[ 34 ] Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. Journal of dentistry 2017; 62:72-80.